In our Riga to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 34 minutes, completing the 2147km route in 25h 59min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 59min (34 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 2h 15min
- Energy: ~394 kWh
- Distance: 2147km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
25h 59min |
26h 33min |
| Charging time: |
2h 15min |
3h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~386 kWh |
~381 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (21 min, 37% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (16 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 3:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco Teplická cesta (21 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 6:
Ledi MS (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 7:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (27 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 8:
Route 80 (10 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 76% → 86%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (29 min, 13% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Promna-Kolonia (14 min, 26% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
HPC Volvo Aleja Powstańców Śląskich (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV smer Beograd (53 min, 10% → 84%)
-
Stop 10:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 34-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 2147km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 15min vs 3h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~394 kWh vs ~480 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons