In our Riga to Warsaw EV duel, the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 37 minutes, completing the 660km route in 8h 11min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 5 E-Tech 150's 330km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 needs only 2 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 5 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 8h 11min (37 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 48min
- Energy: ~104 kWh
- Distance: 660km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
8h 48min |
8h 11min |
| Charging time: |
1h 12min |
48min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
2 |
| Energy used |
~119 kWh |
~120 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Norfa XL (28 min, 13% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (25 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (19 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Riga (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (13 min, 50% → 80%)
-
Stop 2:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (35 min, 10% → 94%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 5 E-Tech 150 achieved a 37-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 660km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 48min vs 1h 12min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~104 kWh vs ~112 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons