In our Rome to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Tesla Model 3 Performance by 21 minutes, completing the 1631km route in 16h 46min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 46min (21 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~266 kWh
- Distance: 1631km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
| Travel time |
16h 46min |
17h 7min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
1h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~294 kWh |
~294 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Secchia Est (11 min, 24% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Rastplatz Eggberg A2 (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 4:
Pfälzer Weinstraße Ost (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Aral Tankstelle (10 min, 15% → 59%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 18% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (11 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
GoFast Rastplatz Erstfeld (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty Autohof Bremgarten (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 5:
Pfälzer Weinstraße Ost (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Shell Autohof (10 min, 13% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY La Place / Gr8 Hotel (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 21-minute advantage over Tesla Model 3 Performance on this 1631km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 1h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~266 kWh vs ~289 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons