In our Rome to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 17 minutes, completing the 1222km route in 23h 18min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 18min (17 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 1h 5min
- Energy: ~199 kWh
- Distance: 1222km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
23h 18min |
23h 35min |
| Charging time: |
1h 5min |
1h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~220 kWh |
~220 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Q8 SS Adriatica (15 min, 15% → 73%)
-
Stop 2:
Xenos (40 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 3:
Sklavenitis Supermarket (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Murge Ovest (10 min, 14% → 40%)
-
Stop 2:
Q8 SS Adriatica (17 min, 30% → 81%)
-
Stop 3:
Xenos (45 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
Sklavenitis Supermarket (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 17-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1222km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 5min vs 1h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~199 kWh vs ~224 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons