In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Alpine A290 by 97 minutes, completing the 1507km route in 14h 37min. The key advantage? 7 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 37min (97 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 42min
- Energy: ~235 kWh
- Distance: 1507km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Alpine A290 |
| Travel time |
14h 37min |
16h 14min |
| Charging time: |
42min |
2h 11min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~271 kWh |
~268 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Povegliano Est (11 min, 16% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Green Deer Bavarian Hotel (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
mblty ROSI'S Autohof (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Alpine A290 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 18% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 3:
Povegliano Est (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Paganella Est (19 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 5:
Hofer (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
Restaurant Gut Rettenberg am Golfplatz (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
Langenbruck A9 (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 9:
Mercedes-Benz Charging Hub Münchberg Autohaus Hahn (10 min, 14% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 11:
TotalEnergies Autohof (12 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 97-minute advantage over Alpine A290 on this 1507km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 42min vs 2h 11min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~235 kWh vs ~269 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons