In our Rome to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Alpine A290 by 184 minutes, completing the 1890km route in 21h 48min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 48min (184 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 44min
- Energy: ~294 kWh
- Distance: 1890km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Alpine A290 |
| Travel time |
21h 48min |
24h 52min |
| Charging time: |
1h 44min |
4h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~338 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 32% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (18 min, 21% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (41 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Alpine A290 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 18% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (20 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (11 min, 10% → 29%)
-
Stop 6:
Petrol (13 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (26 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesla Supercharger (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Martinci (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
JP Putevi Srbije (60 min, 10% → 86%)
-
Stop 11:
Lidl Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul (28 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 12:
Kaufland (18 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 13:
Supercharger Pitesti Retail Park (12 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 184-minute advantage over Alpine A290 on this 1890km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 44min vs 4h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~294 kWh vs ~338 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons