In our Rome to Berlin EV duel, the smart #1 Pro+ beats the SsangYong Korando e-Motion by 89 minutes, completing the 1487km route in 15h 52min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The smart #1 Pro+ needs only 10 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro+
- Total time: 15h 52min (89 min faster)
- Charging stops: 10
- Charging time: 1h 50min
- Energy: ~271 kWh
- Distance: 1487km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
smart #1 Pro+ |
SsangYong Korando e-Motion |
| Travel time |
15h 52min |
17h 21min |
| Charging time: |
1h 50min |
3h 18min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~268 kWh |
~268 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
smart #1 Pro+ Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 26% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 18% → 48%)
-
Stop 3:
Povegliano Est (17 min, 13% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Isarco Est / Eisack Ost (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
Al Tornante Panorama Restaurant & Pizzeria (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
REWE Nymphenburger Straße (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
Rastplatz Sophienberg Ost (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
Hecht Einrichtungen (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 10:
TotalEnergies Autohof (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Berlin
SsangYong Korando e-Motion Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Arezzo Park Hotel (10 min, 22% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Via del Lago (17 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
Campogalliano Est (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 4:
Povegliano Est (18 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Paganella Est (27 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Hofer (10 min, 10% → 33%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell Tankstelle (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 8:
Esso Tankstelle Ungererstraße (17 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 9:
Esso Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 10:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 11:
Frankenwald Ost (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 12:
Burger King Autohof Kleinhelmsdorf (17 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 13:
TotalEnergies Autohof (18 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the smart #1 Pro+ Won
The smart #1 Pro+ achieved a 89-minute advantage over SsangYong Korando e-Motion on this 1487km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 10 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 50min vs 3h 18min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~271 kWh vs ~307 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons