In our Rome to Paris EV duel, the smart #1 Pro beats the SsangYong Korando e-Motion by 117 minutes, completing the 1424km route in 14h 57min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The SsangYong Korando e-Motion's 271km range doesn't beat the smart #1 Pro's 240km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #1 Pro needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #1 Pro
- Total time: 14h 57min (117 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 27min
- Energy: ~279 kWh
- Distance: 1424km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
smart #1 Pro |
SsangYong Korando e-Motion |
| Travel time |
14h 57min |
16h 54min |
| Charging time: |
1h 27min |
3h 18min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~256 kWh |
~257 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 26% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Secchia Est (12 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (13 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (16 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 6:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Ambreuil (13 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 7:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (13 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Paris
SsangYong Korando e-Motion Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Arezzo Park Hotel (23 min, 22% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (27 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (22 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Villarboit Nord (16 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Les Iles de Brissogne (22 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Shopping Etrembières (27 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 7:
Mâcon Supercharger (15 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire du Creux-Moreau (19 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de Venoy Soleil Levant (15 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
IONITY Aire de Darvault (12 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the smart #1 Pro Won
The smart #1 Pro achieved a 117-minute advantage over SsangYong Korando e-Motion on this 1424km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 27min vs 3h 18min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~279 kWh vs ~294 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons