In our Rome to Bern EV duel, the Audi Q4 40 e-tron beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 12 minutes, completing the 855km route in 9h 40min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q4 40 e-tron
- Total time: 9h 40min (12 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 43min
- Energy: ~158 kWh
- Distance: 855km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 40min |
9h 52min |
| Charging time: |
43min |
51min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~154 kWh |
~154 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (18 min, 13% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (15 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (10 min, 10% → 37%)
- Arrival: Bern
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 29% → 57%)
-
Stop 2:
Secchia Est (15 min, 11% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Pit Stop Café (16 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
ACW Auto-Center Visp (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bern
Why the Audi Q4 40 e-tron Won
The Audi Q4 40 e-tron achieved a 12-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 855km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 43min vs 51min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons