In our Rome to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 35 e-tron by 210 minutes, completing the 1853km route in 22h 1min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 1min (210 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 2h 5min
- Energy: ~302 kWh
- Distance: 1853km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 35 e-tron |
| Travel time |
22h 1min |
25h 31min |
| Charging time: |
2h 5min |
4h 45min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~334 kWh |
~337 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 17% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 27% → 65%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (12 min, 15% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Martinci (21 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (72 min, 10% → 74%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Audi Q4 35 e-tron Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Arno Est (17 min, 12% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Borgo Mascarella (17 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Vega (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (13 min, 10% → 31%)
-
Stop 6:
Petrol (14 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (25 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 8:
Tesla Supercharger (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 9:
OMV Martinci (21 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 10:
Stop Shop (89 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 11:
Lidl Bulevardul Mihai Viteazul (27 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 12:
Plus Aqua (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 13:
Supercharger Pitesti Retail Park (13 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 210-minute advantage over Audi Q4 35 e-tron on this 1853km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 5min vs 4h 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~302 kWh vs ~353 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons