In our Bucharest to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 35 e-tron by 195 minutes, completing the 1861km route in 21h 24min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 24min (195 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 33min
- Energy: ~304 kWh
- Distance: 1861km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 35 e-tron |
| Travel time |
21h 24min |
24h 39min |
| Charging time: |
1h 33min |
4h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
13 |
| Energy used |
~335 kWh |
~337 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (19 min, 36% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
Emmezeta Jankomir (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 5:
Badia Nuova Ovest (15 min, 10% → 71%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q4 35 e-tron Route
- Start: Bucharest (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger Promenada Mall (11 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Bulevardul Nicolae Iorga (40 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
Stop Shop (31 min, 10% → 32%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Dobrinci (21 min, 16% → 67%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesla Supercharger (26 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Shell (14 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 8:
Petrol (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 9:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
Bazzera Nord (18 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 11:
Electra Borgo Mascarella (15 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 12:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 13:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (16 min, 10% → 62%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 195-minute advantage over Audi Q4 35 e-tron on this 1861km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 33min vs 4h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~304 kWh vs ~354 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons