In our Rome to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 63 minutes, completing the 1890km route in 21h 48min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 21h 48min (63 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 44min
- Energy: ~294 kWh
- Distance: 1890km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
21h 48min |
22h 51min |
| Charging time: |
1h 44min |
3h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~340 kWh |
~365 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 22% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 32% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (18 min, 21% → 80%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (41 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (17 min, 24% → 71%)
-
Stop 2:
Adige Est (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (10 min, 10% → 27%)
-
Stop 5:
Lukovica south (Ljubljana - Maribor) (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Petrol Murska Sobota jug (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Balatonkeresztúr (Richtung Budapest) (20 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 8:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (28 min, 10% → 83%)
-
Stop 9:
Rompetrol A1 Sagu Sens Timisoara (29 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 10:
OMV Miercurea Sibiului stanga (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 11:
Kaufland Gavana (11 min, 10% → 47%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 63-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1890km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 44min vs 3h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~294 kWh vs ~298 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons