In our Rome to London EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 102 minutes, completing the 1759km route in 18h 54min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 18h 54min (102 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 52min
- Energy: ~274 kWh
- Distance: 1759km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
18h 54min |
20h 36min |
| Charging time: |
52min |
2h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Gotthardraststätte A2 Nord (10 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Rue de la Madeleine (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 4:
Aire de Champ Roland (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
ENGIE Eurotunnel Main Terminal (10 min, 12% → 49%)
- Arrival: London
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 24% → 53%)
-
Stop 2:
Cantagallo Est (12 min, 17% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Giornali Lotto Bar Sport (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Lario Est (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Lavorgo Nord (18 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 6:
Rastplatz Mühlematt Ost (15 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Fastned Rue de la Madeleine (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de Toul Dommartin (21 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 9:
Aire de Champ Roland (19 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 10:
Fastned Aire de Saint-Hilaire Cottes (27 min, 10% → 81%)
- Arrival: London
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 102-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1759km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 52min vs 2h 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~274 kWh vs ~277 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons