In our Rome to Riga EV duel, the VW ID.7 Pro S beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 11 minutes, completing the 2430km route in 25h 44min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The VW ID.7 Pro S needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
VW ID.7 Pro S
- Total time: 25h 44min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 53min
- Energy: ~369 kWh
- Distance: 2430km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
VW ID.7 Pro S |
| Travel time |
25h 55min |
25h 44min |
| Charging time: |
1h 52min |
1h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~437 kWh |
~435 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 23% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger AMIGO (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Factory Annopol (21 min, 10% → 81%)
-
Stop 8:
Jono Dailidės (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 9:
IONITY Circle K Aplinkkelis (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Riga
VW ID.7 Pro S Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (16 min, 21% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Billa Töschling (15 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
MOL Kroměřížská (18 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 6:
Factory Annopol (24 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 12% → 44%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the VW ID.7 Pro S Won
The VW ID.7 Pro S achieved a 11-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2430km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~369 kWh vs ~446 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons