In our Rome to Sofia EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi e-tron GT by 62 minutes, completing the 1673km route in 17h 17min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 17min (62 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 28min
- Energy: ~300 kWh
- Distance: 1673km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi e-tron GT |
| Travel time |
17h 17min |
18h 19min |
| Charging time: |
1h 28min |
1h 57min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~301 kWh |
~298 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Lom east (Koper - Ljubljana) (10 min, 32% → 40%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (11 min, 16% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesla Supercharger (11 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (36 min, 10% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Audi e-tron GT Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 36% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Adige Est (12 min, 13% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Risparmio Casa (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 4:
Barje Jug (10 min, 16% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Designer Outlet Croatia (13 min, 11% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesla Supercharger (17 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 7:
JP Putevi Srbije (17 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 8:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (28 min, 10% → 53%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 62-minute advantage over Audi e-tron GT on this 1673km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 28min vs 1h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~300 kWh vs ~374 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons