In our Rome to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 71 minutes, completing the 2261km route in 23h 7min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 7min (71 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 25min
- Energy: ~369 kWh
- Distance: 2261km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
23h 7min |
24h 18min |
| Charging time: |
1h 25min |
2h 33min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~407 kWh |
~407 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (13 min, 17% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Factory Annopol (17 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 7:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (12 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Fella Est (11 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Raststation Föhrenberg (14 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Olympia (15 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 7:
Uniwar P1 (14 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (15 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 9:
Factory Annopol (23 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 10:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (23 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 71-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 2261km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 25min vs 2h 33min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~369 kWh vs ~393 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons