In our Vilnius to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 by 65 minutes, completing the 2266km route in 23h 7min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 23h 7min (65 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 28min
- Energy: ~370 kWh
- Distance: 2266km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
23h 7min |
24h 12min |
| Charging time: |
1h 28min |
2h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~408 kWh |
~407 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Pas Lado (10 min, 83% → 90%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Zachód (14 min, 23% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Mořice Bistro (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Raststation Bad Fischau (10 min, 13% → 59%)
-
Stop 6:
Billa Töschling (14 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 13% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Shell (16 min, 12% → 49%)
-
Stop 2:
Hotel Górski (10 min, 10% → 36%)
-
Stop 3:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 4:
Uniwar P1 (14 min, 12% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (12 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 6:
Raststation (18 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Tankstelle (16 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Ledra Ovest (20 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (18 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 10:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (17 min, 10% → 52%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 65-minute advantage over Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 on this 2266km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 28min vs 2h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~370 kWh vs ~394 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons