In our Rome to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Alpine A290 by 120 minutes, completing the 1765km route in 17h 36min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 36min (120 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~288 kWh
- Distance: 1765km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Alpine A290 |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 36min |
17h 36min |
| Charging time: |
2h 45min |
58min |
| Charging stops: |
13 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~318 kWh |
~316 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Alpine A290 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Osteria De'Giusti (14 min, 18% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (20 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (14 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Le Valli Di Carnia (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
Electra Pizza Plus (10 min, 13% → 44%)
-
Stop 6:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 14% → 45%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV Raststation Kapfenberg Süd (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 10:
Tesco (14 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 11:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 12:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (18 min, 13% → 61%)
-
Stop 13:
Zajazd Plan (12 min, 10% → 49%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (13 min, 17% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 120-minute advantage over Alpine A290 on this 1765km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 2h 45min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~288 kWh vs ~315 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons