In our Warsaw to Rome EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Alpine A290 by 109 minutes, completing the 1763km route in 17h 35min. The key advantage? 9 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 14 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 35min (109 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 56min
- Energy: ~288 kWh
- Distance: 1763km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Alpine A290 |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
19h 24min |
17h 35min |
| Charging time: |
2h 40min |
56min |
| Charging stops: |
14 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Alpine A290 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Woźniki Zachód (10 min, 17% → 47%)
-
Stop 2:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 12% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Signalbau (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Teplárny Brno Olympia DC (11 min, 13% → 49%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV Tankstelle Breitenleer Straße Ost (11 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 6:
McDonald's (14 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 7:
Spar (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
Electra Pizza Plus (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 9:
Ledra Ovest (15 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 10:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (15 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 11:
Castel Bentivoglio Ovest (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 12:
Ristorante Goyo (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 13:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (12 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 14:
Giove Ovest (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 34% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Tankstelle Hirschstettner Straße (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Tankstelle (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre (12 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 109-minute advantage over Alpine A290 on this 1763km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 14 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 56min vs 2h 40min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~288 kWh vs ~315 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons