In our Rome to Warsaw EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 15 minutes, completing the 1756km route in 17h 36min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 36min (15 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~287 kWh
- Distance: 1756km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 36min |
17h 51min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
1h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~316 kWh |
~317 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (13 min, 17% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
Electra Pizza Plus (12 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 3:
Raststation Föhrenberg (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (13 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Area di Servizio Castel Bentivoglio Est (13 min, 18% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Electrip Le Valli Di Carnia (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (10 min, 15% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger AMIGO (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (11 min, 10% → 48%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 15-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1756km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 1h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~287 kWh vs ~322 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons