In our Rome to Warsaw EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 375 minutes, completing the 1758km route in 18h 2min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 27,840 less, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 375 minutes on this route.
The Tesla Model 3 Performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Performance
- Total time: 18h 2min (375 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 20min
- Energy: ~311 kWh
- Distance: 1758km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
Tesla Model S 90 |
| Travel time |
18h 2min |
24h 17min |
| Charging time: |
1h 20min |
6h 57min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
10 |
| Energy used |
~316 kWh |
~321 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Cantagallo Est (10 min, 18% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (10 min, 13% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
Fella Est (10 min, 15% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (10 min, 22% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Olympia (10 min, 16% → 54%)
-
Stop 7:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Tesla Model S 90 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Arno Est (44 min, 26% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (65 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 3:
Gonars Sud (49 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Maria-Gailer-Straße (23 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 5:
F. Leitner (10 min, 10% → 19%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger manufaktur matauschek (32 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell (67 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV (30 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 9:
MOP Orlen Wieszowa Południe (71 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 10:
Orlen Katowicka (26 min, 10% → 35%)
- Arrival: Warsaw
Why the Tesla Model 3 Performance Won
The Tesla Model 3 Performance achieved a 375-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 90 on this 1758km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 20min vs 6h 57min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~311 kWh vs ~426 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons