In our Warsaw to Rome EV duel, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 364 minutes, completing the 1762km route in 18h 2min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
Despite costing 27,840 less, the Tesla Model 3 Performance beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 364 minutes on this route.
The Tesla Model 3 Performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Tesla Model 3 Performance
- Total time: 18h 2min (364 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 20min
- Energy: ~312 kWh
- Distance: 1762km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Tesla Model 3 Performance |
Tesla Model S 90 |
| Travel time |
18h 2min |
24h 6min |
| Charging time: |
1h 20min |
6h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Tesla Model 3 Performance Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Moya (10 min, 21% → 56%)
-
Stop 2:
MOL Kroměřížská (10 min, 22% → 58%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Raststation Bad Fischau (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
Ledra Ovest (14 min, 10% → 62%)
-
Stop 6:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (13 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 7:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (12 min, 10% → 56%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model S 90 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
M1 Shopping Center (56 min, 12% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Penny Ztracená (29 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV (50 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (37 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger manufaktur matauschek (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Smatrics Sonnenkraft Campus (16 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Maria-Gailer-Straße (23 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
Smatrics Eurospar (53 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 9:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (73 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 10:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (48 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger La Pergola (10 min, 10% → 35%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Tesla Model 3 Performance Won
The Tesla Model 3 Performance achieved a 364-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 90 on this 1762km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 20min vs 6h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~312 kWh vs ~427 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons