In our Sofia to Athens EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 49 minutes, completing the 787km route in 8h 38min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 8h 38min (49 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 18min
- Energy: ~122 kWh
- Distance: 787km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
8h 38min |
9h 27min |
| Charging time: |
18min |
58min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~142 kWh |
~142 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Skotina dir Athen (18 min, 32% → 81%)
- Arrival: Athens
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Fines (10 min, 49% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
Skotina dir Athen (18 min, 11% → 66%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (20 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
Shell Acharnon (10 min, 10% → 16%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 49-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 787km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 18min vs 58min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~122 kWh vs ~130 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons