In our Sofia to Berlin EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 93 minutes, completing the 1615km route in 16h 9min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 9min (93 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 51min
- Energy: ~264 kWh
- Distance: 1615km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
16h 9min |
17h 42min |
| Charging time: |
51min |
2h 22min |
| Charging stops: |
5 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~291 kWh |
~291 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 12% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (11 min, 16% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
ČEZ Mikulášov sever (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (15 min, 52% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (44 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (10 min, 14% → 47%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Győr (11 min, 16% → 52%)
-
Stop 6:
Ladná směr Brno (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 7:
Základní škola (11 min, 13% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Burger King Kutnohorská (13 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 9:
Esso Tankstelle (18 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 93-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1615km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 51min vs 2h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~264 kWh vs ~267 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons