In our Berlin to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 98 minutes, completing the 1626km route in 16h 20min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 5, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 20min (98 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 1h 3min
- Energy: ~265 kWh
- Distance: 1626km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
16h 20min |
17h 58min |
| Charging time: |
1h 3min |
2h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~293 kWh |
~293 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's (12 min, 24% → 70%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 16% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Ledi MS (31 min, 11% → 90%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Berlin (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MoBi-Punkt Liststraße (10 min, 46% → 68%)
-
Stop 2:
MOL Bělčice (11 min, 15% → 52%)
-
Stop 3:
D-1 Autopark (11 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Bábolna (15 min, 12% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (26 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 7:
OMV smer Beograd (20 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Gazprom (28 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 9:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 98-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1626km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 3min vs 2h 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~265 kWh vs ~269 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons