In our Sofia to Berlin EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 62 minutes, completing the 1616km route in 16h 20min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 1, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 20min (62 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 2min
- Energy: ~290 kWh
- Distance: 1616km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
17h 22min |
16h 20min |
| Charging time: |
2h 3min |
1h 2min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~291 kWh |
~291 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 60% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (30 min, 15% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 37%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (16 min, 12% → 54%)
-
Stop 5:
ZSE Motor-Car Lamač (14 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
OC Karlov (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Burger King Kutnohorská (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
Esso Tankstelle (17 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (14 min, 13% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (15 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Pávov Sever (13 min, 10% → 67%)
-
Stop 5:
Esso Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 62-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1616km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 2min vs 2h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~290 kWh vs ~299 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons