In our Sofia to Rome EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 54 minutes, completing the 1659km route in 17h 10min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 5 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 17h 10min (54 min faster)
- Charging stops: 5
- Charging time: 1h 14min
- Energy: ~298 kWh
- Distance: 1659km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
18h 4min |
17h 10min |
| Charging time: |
2h 5min |
1h 14min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~299 kWh |
~298 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 60% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV A1 (15 min, 15% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesla Supercharger (27 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY MOL Tankstelle (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 5:
Smatrics Risparmio Casa (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Autogrill Po Ovest (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Ristorante Goyo (13 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 8:
Area di Servizio Fabro Ovest (12 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Rome
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV A1 (17 min, 12% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
Tesla Supercharger (18 min, 10% → 76%)
-
Stop 3:
Petrol (17 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Eni (10 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Osteria De'Giusti (12 min, 10% → 64%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 54-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 1659km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 5 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 14min vs 2h 5min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~298 kWh vs ~307 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons