In our Sofia to Bratislava EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 62 minutes, completing the 957km route in 9h 26min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 26min (62 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 22min
- Energy: ~156 kWh
- Distance: 957km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 26min |
10h 28min |
| Charging time: |
22min |
1h 24min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~172 kWh |
~172 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 25% → 63%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (12 min, 12% → 63%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (15 min, 52% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (44 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 4:
Páty Nord (15 min, 14% → 61%)
- Arrival: Bratislava
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 62-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 957km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 22min vs 1h 24min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~156 kWh vs ~158 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons