In our Sofia to Budapest EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 56 minutes, completing the 759km route in 7h 39min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 1 charging stops compared to 3 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 7h 39min (56 min faster)
- Charging stops: 1
- Charging time: 16min
- Energy: ~124 kWh
- Distance: 759km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
7h 39min |
8h 35min |
| Charging time: |
16min |
1h 9min |
| Charging stops: |
1 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~137 kWh |
~137 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (16 min, 25% → 77%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (15 min, 52% → 78%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (44 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Budapest
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 56-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 759km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 1 stops vs 3 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 16min vs 1h 9min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~124 kWh vs ~125 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons