In our Sofia to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 8 minutes, completing the 1284km route in 12h 34min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on August 15, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 34min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~200 kWh
- Distance: 1284km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
12h 34min |
12h 42min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
43min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~231 kWh |
~231 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (13 min, 29% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tópark (11 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Agrotec (10 min, 10% → 51%)
- Arrival: Prague
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (13 min, 15% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Győr (10 min, 11% → 58%)
-
Stop 4:
B.C.S. (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 8-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1284km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~200 kWh vs ~236 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons