In our Sofia to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 38 minutes, completing the 2105km route in 24h 24min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 6 charging stops compared to 8 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 24h 24min (38 min faster)
- Charging stops: 6
- Charging time: 1h 21min
- Energy: ~328 kWh
- Distance: 2105km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
24h 24min |
25h 2min |
| Charging time: |
1h 21min |
1h 54min |
| Charging stops: |
6 |
8 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~379 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 29% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (10 min, 37% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (16 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (13 min, 15% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (18 min, 27% → 77%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 16% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (19 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland (24 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 8:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 38-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 2105km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 6 stops vs 8 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 21min vs 1h 54min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~328 kWh vs ~386 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons