In our Sofia to Riga EV duel, the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the smart #1 Pro by 79 minutes, completing the 2103km route in 25h 5min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on August 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 8 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 25h 5min (79 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 57min
- Energy: ~377 kWh
- Distance: 2103km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance |
smart #1 Pro |
| Travel time |
25h 5min |
26h 24min |
| Charging time: |
1h 57min |
2h 43min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~379 kWh |
~380 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (14 min, 13% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (19 min, 27% → 79%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 6:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (20 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland (24 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 8:
Cafe Baltica (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Riga
smart #1 Pro Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (14 min, 50% → 81%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (13 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
BS Gazprom (12 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 4:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco (16 min, 11% → 70%)
-
Stop 6:
Kaufland Wolkera (10 min, 10% → 46%)
-
Stop 7:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 51%)
-
Stop 8:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 9:
KFC (10 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 10:
Kaufland (24 min, 10% → 63%)
-
Stop 11:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (22 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 12:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (12 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 79-minute advantage over smart #1 Pro on this 2103km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 57min vs 2h 43min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~377 kWh vs ~412 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons