In our Sofia to Tallinn EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 126 minutes, completing the 2412km route in 28h 42min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 7 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 28h 42min (126 min faster)
- Charging stops: 7
- Charging time: 1h 35min
- Energy: ~375 kWh
- Distance: 2412km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
| Travel time |
28h 42min |
30h 48min |
| Charging time: |
1h 35min |
3h 31min |
| Charging stops: |
7 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~434 kWh |
~436 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (10 min, 29% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 18% → 60%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (10 min, 37% → 67%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (16 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 5:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (25 min, 10% → 80%)
-
Stop 6:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Neste (14 min, 15% → 71%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 60% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (30 min, 15% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (18 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Wolkera (13 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell MOP East (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Lakeside (34 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 9:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (27 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 10:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 11:
Neste (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 126-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2412km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 7 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 35min vs 3h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~375 kWh vs ~446 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons