In our Sofia to Tallinn EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 89 minutes, completing the 2423km route in 29h 19min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 20, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 29h 19min (89 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 6min
- Energy: ~445 kWh
- Distance: 2423km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
30h 48min |
29h 19min |
| Charging time: |
3h 31min |
2h 6min |
| Charging stops: |
12 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~436 kWh |
~434 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Naplatna rampa Nais istočno (10 min, 60% → 72%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Zemun Park (30 min, 15% → 75%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (11 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (18 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Wolkera (13 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 6:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 7:
Shell MOP East (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 8:
Lakeside (34 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 9:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (27 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 10:
Neste Šilagalio Žiedo (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 11:
Neste (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 12:
IONITY Circle K (14 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Sofia (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Zemun Park (13 min, 15% → 67%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Tesco (18 min, 27% → 77%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Shell MOP East (10 min, 16% → 48%)
-
Stop 6:
Wodny Park Warszawianka (19 min, 10% → 70%)
-
Stop 7:
Kaufland (26 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 8:
IONITY (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 9:
Neste (10 min, 17% → 60%)
- Arrival: Tallinn
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 89-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2423km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 6min vs 3h 31min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~445 kWh vs ~448 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons