In our Stockholm to Prague EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 67 minutes, completing the 1375km route in 16h 55min. The key advantage? 5 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 55min (67 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 40min
- Energy: ~214 kWh
- Distance: 1375km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 55min |
18h 2min |
| Charging time: |
40min |
1h 48min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~248 kWh |
~248 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Stockholm (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Circle K Ljungby Nyponvägen Trucks (10 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Væggerløsevej (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (10 min, 32% → 68%)
-
Stop 4:
TotalEnergies Tankstelle (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Prague
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Stockholm (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Burger King (19 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Fastned Barbecue barn (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Clever Nordhøj (10 min, 17% → 48%)
-
Stop 5:
Væggerløsevej (11 min, 17% → 51%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Van der Valk Resort Linstow (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 7:
McDonald's TotalEnergies Autohof (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 8:
Rüblingsheide (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 9:
SachsenEnergie City Center (15 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Prague
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 67-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1375km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 40min vs 1h 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~214 kWh vs ~219 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons