In our Vienna to Berlin EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 8 minutes, completing the 626km route in 7h 26min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 7h 26min (8 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 35min
- Energy: ~100 kWh
- Distance: 626km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
7h 34min |
7h 26min |
| Charging time: |
41min |
35min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~113 kWh |
~112 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Shell (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
HPC Globus (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
SachsenEnergie City Center (10 min, 20% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Rasthof Berstetal (10 min, 10% → 40%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Kardausova DC (14 min, 12% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
SachsenEnergie City Center (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 3:
Rasthof Berstetal (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Berlin
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 8-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 626km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 35min vs 41min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~100 kWh vs ~106 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons