In our Vienna to Riga EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 5 E-Tech 150 by 82 minutes, completing the 1324km route in 14h 23min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 2, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 7 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 14h 23min (82 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~206 kWh
- Distance: 1324km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
14h 23min |
15h 45min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
1h 50min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
7 |
| Energy used |
~238 kWh |
~239 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 14% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
Blue City (19 min, 14% → 80%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (10 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Riga
Renault 5 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
IONITY Avion Shopping Park (10 min, 12% → 44%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (15 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 3:
Zajazd Plan (12 min, 10% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
Factory Annopol (32 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rudniki Południe (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
Jono Dailidės (21 min, 15% → 74%)
-
Stop 7:
Neste Pasvalio (10 min, 10% → 42%)
- Arrival: Riga
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 82-minute advantage over Renault 5 E-Tech 150 on this 1324km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 7 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 1h 50min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~206 kWh vs ~209 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons