In our Vienna to Rome EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 beats the Renault Kangoo E-Tech by 93 minutes, completing the 1096km route in 11h 21min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220
- Total time: 11h 21min (93 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 57min
- Energy: ~191 kWh
- Distance: 1096km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Kangoo E-Tech |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
12h 54min |
11h 21min |
| Charging time: |
2h 22min |
57min |
| Charging stops: |
9 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~197 kWh |
~197 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Kangoo E-Tech Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hub Ringrast, Spielberg (11 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Tankstelle, Pöckstein-Zwischenwässern (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Pizza Plus, Villach (16 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
Ledra Ovest, Colloredo di Monte Albano (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Centro Commerciale Porte di Mestre, Venezia (22 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 6:
Castel Bentivoglio Ovest, Bentivoglio (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Ristorante Goyo, Calenzano (13 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 8:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest, Badia al Pino (19 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 9:
Giove Ovest, Giove (13 min, 10% → 50%)
- Arrival: Rome
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Electra Pizza Plus, Villach (17 min, 33% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Eni, Monselice (19 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Arno Ovest, Reggello (21 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 achieved a 93-minute advantage over Renault Kangoo E-Tech on this 1096km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 57min vs 2h 22min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~191 kWh vs ~222 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons