In our Rome to Vienna EV duel, the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 beats the Renault Kangoo E-Tech by 107 minutes, completing the 1100km route in 11h 19min. The key advantage? 6 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 needs only 4 charging stops compared to 10 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220
- Total time: 11h 19min (107 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~191 kWh
- Distance: 1100km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Renault Kangoo E-Tech |
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 |
| Travel time |
13h 6min |
11h 19min |
| Charging time: |
2h 26min |
53min |
| Charging stops: |
10 |
4 |
| Energy used |
~198 kWh |
~196 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Renault Kangoo E-Tech Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Supercharger La Bettola del Buttero (10 min, 35% → 62%)
-
Stop 2:
Arno Est (23 min, 16% → 77%)
-
Stop 3:
Electra Borgo Mascarella (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 4:
Adige Est (17 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (21 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 6:
Electrip Le Valli Di Carnia (16 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 7:
Autobahnraststation Marché Wörthersee (11 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV Tankstelle (12 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
F. Leitner (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 10:
Mer Ladepark (16 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Route
- Start: Rome (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Adige Est (10 min, 10% → 34%)
-
Stop 2:
Supercharger Omnia Hotel (12 min, 12% → 43%)
-
Stop 3:
Fella Est (11 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV Tankstelle (20 min, 10% → 59%)
- Arrival: Vienna
Why the Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 Won
The Renault Scenic E-Tech 220 achieved a 107-minute advantage over Renault Kangoo E-Tech on this 1100km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 10 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 2h 26min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~191 kWh vs ~223 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons