In our Vienna to Sofia EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 70 minutes, completing the 1006km route in 9h 58min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 2 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 9h 58min (70 min faster)
- Charging stops: 2
- Charging time: 34min
- Energy: ~157 kWh
- Distance: 1006km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
9h 58min |
11h 8min |
| Charging time: |
34min |
1h 15min |
| Charging stops: |
2 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~181 kWh |
~181 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (10 min, 52% → 77%)
-
Stop 2:
Ledi MS (24 min, 23% → 86%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Inárcsi pihenőhely Szeged (15 min, 23% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
OMV Backa Topola jug (10 min, 10% → 44%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV smer Beograd (10 min, 19% → 39%)
-
Stop 4:
JP Putevi Srbije (19 min, 15% → 69%)
-
Stop 5:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (21 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Sofia
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 70-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1006km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 2 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 34min vs 1h 15min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~157 kWh vs ~166 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons