In our Vienna to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 56 minutes, completing the 1170km route in 12h 14min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 3, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 14min (56 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 39min
- Energy: ~191 kWh
- Distance: 1170km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
12h 14min |
13h 10min |
| Charging time: |
39min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~211 kWh |
~210 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Moya Port Radomsko (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Blue City (19 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 3:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 38%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 11% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (10 min, 21% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Zajazd Plan (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Fabryczna (34 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rudniki Południe (30 min, 10% → 77%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Avant e-tron performance achieved a 56-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1170km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 39min vs 1h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~191 kWh vs ~193 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons