In our Vienna to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 41 minutes, completing the 1166km route in 12h 29min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 3 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 12h 29min (41 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 58min
- Energy: ~214 kWh
- Distance: 1166km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
12h 29min |
13h 10min |
| Charging time: |
58min |
1h 35min |
| Charging stops: |
3 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~210 kWh |
~210 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (19 min, 17% → 66%)
-
Stop 2:
Blue City (14 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 3:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (25 min, 10% → 58%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vienna (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Uniwar P1 (10 min, 11% → 45%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Dobieszowice Wschód (10 min, 21% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Zajazd Plan (11 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Biedronka Fabryczna (34 min, 10% → 82%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Rudniki Południe (30 min, 10% → 77%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 41-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1166km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 58min vs 1h 35min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
Related Comparisons