In our Vilnius to Amsterdam EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 by 111 minutes, completing the 1689km route in 16h 37min. The key advantage? 8 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 12 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 37min (111 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 49min
- Energy: ~263 kWh
- Distance: 1689km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
16h 37min |
18h 28min |
| Charging time: |
49min |
2h 25min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
12 |
| Energy used |
~304 kWh |
~305 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 14% → 58%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Skarboszewo (10 min, 14% → 61%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (16 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (13 min, 10% → 65%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (13 min, 30% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Kaufland (10 min, 10% → 29%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell (10 min, 19% → 49%)
-
Stop 4:
MOP Bolimów (16 min, 12% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
MOP Osiecza (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 6:
MOP Dopiewiec (15 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 7:
Orlen A2 MOP Gnilec (13 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 8:
NORMA (11 min, 10% → 47%)
-
Stop 9:
Aral Tankstelle (11 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 10:
Magic Spielhalle (12 min, 10% → 48%)
-
Stop 11:
WSO Sicherheitsdienst (14 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 12:
Tango Vundelaar (10 min, 10% → 41%)
- Arrival: Amsterdam
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 111-minute advantage over Renault 4 E-Tech 150 on this 1689km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 12 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 49min vs 2h 25min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~263 kWh vs ~269 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons