In our Vilnius to Athens EV duel, the Audi Q6 e-tron performance beats the Audi Q4 40 e-tron by 88 minutes, completing the 2669km route in 30h 30min. The key advantage? 4 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance needs only 9 charging stops compared to 13 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi Q6 e-tron performance
- Total time: 30h 30min (88 min faster)
- Charging stops: 9
- Charging time: 2h 37min
- Energy: ~490 kWh
- Distance: 2669km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi Q4 40 e-tron |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
31h 58min |
30h 30min |
| Charging time: |
4h 2min |
2h 37min |
| Charging stops: |
13 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~480 kWh |
~480 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi Q4 40 e-tron Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
McDonald's Dubowo Drugie (18 min, 46% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (17 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell MOP West (12 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (10 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 5:
Tesco Teplická cesta (18 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 6:
Tesco (11 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (24 min, 10% → 66%)
-
Stop 8:
OMV smer Beograd (45 min, 10% → 78%)
-
Stop 9:
Naplatna rampa Nais zapadno (23 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 10:
Makpetrol A1 (16 min, 10% → 53%)
-
Stop 11:
Park Hotel Polykastro (11 min, 10% → 39%)
-
Stop 12:
Skotina dir Athen (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 13:
Shell (19 min, 10% → 60%)
- Arrival: Athens
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 69% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (20 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 3:
Centrum Zakupowe Jan (21 min, 10% → 77%)
-
Stop 4:
Tesco (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 5:
IONITY Csalánosi Csárda (18 min, 13% → 77%)
-
Stop 6:
JP Putevi Srbije (34 min, 10% → 88%)
-
Stop 7:
Makpetrol A1 (20 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 8:
Korinos dir Athen (11 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 9:
Shell (13 min, 10% → 54%)
- Arrival: Athens
Why the Audi Q6 e-tron performance Won
The Audi Q6 e-tron performance achieved a 88-minute advantage over Audi Q4 40 e-tron on this 2669km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 9 stops vs 13 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 37min vs 4h 2min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~490 kWh vs ~494 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons