In our Vilnius to Bucharest EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge by 109 minutes, completing the 1446km route in 22h 39min. The key advantage? 2 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 6, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 6 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 22h 39min (109 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 2h 2min
- Energy: ~225 kWh
- Distance: 1446km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge |
| Travel time |
22h 39min |
24h 28min |
| Charging time: |
2h 2min |
3h 16min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
6 |
| Energy used |
~260 kWh |
~260 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Belorusneft Tankstelle #92 (27 min, 37% → 61%)
-
Stop 2:
Shell Bugaivka (51 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 3:
Maysternya Smaku (15 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland Sucedava (29 min, 10% → 72%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Belorusneft Tankstelle 31 (13 min, 40% → 59%)
-
Stop 2:
Belorusneft (70 min, 10% → 90%)
-
Stop 3:
Shell Bugaivka (61 min, 10% → 85%)
-
Stop 4:
Maysternya Smaku (18 min, 10% → 64%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland Sucedava (24 min, 10% → 73%)
-
Stop 6:
Supercharger Galeria Mall (10 min, 10% → 44%)
- Arrival: Bucharest
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 109-minute advantage over Renault Megane E-TECH EV60 optimum charge on this 1446km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 6 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 2h 2min vs 3h 16min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~225 kWh vs ~239 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons