In our Vilnius to Helsinki EV duel, the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 beats the MG MG4 64kWh by 11 minutes, completing the 680km route in 10h 57min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 4, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The MG MG4 64kWh's 360km range doesn't beat the Renault 4 E-Tech 150's 327km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 needs only 3 charging stops compared to 4 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Renault 4 E-Tech 150
- Total time: 10h 57min (11 min faster)
- Charging stops: 3
- Charging time: 37min
- Energy: ~108 kWh
- Distance: 680km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
MG MG4 64kWh |
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 |
| Travel time |
11h 8min |
10h 57min |
| Charging time: |
48min |
37min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
3 |
| Energy used |
~122 kWh |
~122 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
MG MG4 64kWh Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Neste (16 min, 21% → 60%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (10 min, 10% → 40%)
-
Stop 3:
Neste Niidu (11 min, 18% → 48%)
-
Stop 4:
Neste Pääsküla (11 min, 10% → 43%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Manufaktūra (10 min, 10% → 43%)
-
Stop 2:
Neste (12 min, 10% → 50%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Circle K (15 min, 10% → 57%)
- Arrival: Helsinki
Why the Renault 4 E-Tech 150 Won
The Renault 4 E-Tech 150 achieved a 11-minute advantage over MG MG4 64kWh on this 680km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 3 stops vs 4 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 37min vs 48min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~108 kWh vs ~115 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons