In our Vilnius to Zagreb EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 22 minutes, completing the 1471km route in 16h 27min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on July 19, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 16h 27min (22 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 45min
- Energy: ~229 kWh
- Distance: 1471km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
16h 27min |
16h 49min |
| Charging time: |
45min |
1h 3min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~265 kWh |
~266 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Ekoen Atrium Reduta (10 min, 11% → 55%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Zachód (12 min, 24% → 64%)
-
Stop 3:
Kaufland (13 min, 10% → 65%)
-
Stop 4:
OMV (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Vilnius (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 69% → 83%)
-
Stop 2:
Factory Annopol (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
IONITY Hotel Porto (16 min, 15% → 74%)
-
Stop 4:
Kaufland (17 min, 10% → 75%)
-
Stop 5:
OMV (10 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Zagreb
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 22-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1471km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 45min vs 1h 3min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~229 kWh vs ~270 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons