In our Zagreb to Vilnius EV duel, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance beats the Audi Q6 e-tron performance by 16 minutes, completing the 1525km route in 15h 58min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance needs only 4 charging stops compared to 5 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance
- Total time: 15h 58min (16 min faster)
- Charging stops: 4
- Charging time: 53min
- Energy: ~237 kWh
- Distance: 1525km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance |
Audi Q6 e-tron performance |
| Travel time |
15h 58min |
16h 14min |
| Charging time: |
53min |
1h 4min |
| Charging stops: |
4 |
5 |
| Energy used |
~275 kWh |
~274 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
HPC Futurum (16 min, 15% → 74%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 10% → 41%)
-
Stop 3:
Blue City (17 min, 10% → 74%)
-
Stop 4:
Hesburger Kantališkiai (10 min, 10% → 36%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Audi Q6 e-tron performance Route
- Start: Zagreb (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
OMV Tankstelle Breitenleer Straße West (11 min, 24% → 69%)
-
Stop 2:
IONITY Avion Shopping Park (10 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 3:
Orlen Stobiecko Szlacheckie Wschód (10 min, 12% → 47%)
-
Stop 4:
Blue City (15 min, 10% → 71%)
-
Stop 5:
Kaufland (18 min, 10% → 55%)
- Arrival: Vilnius
Why the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance Won
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron performance achieved a 16-minute advantage over Audi Q6 e-tron performance on this 1525km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 4 stops vs 5 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 53min vs 1h 4min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~237 kWh vs ~280 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons