In our Warsaw to Paris EV duel, the smart #3 Pro beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 317 minutes, completing the 1587km route in 15h 51min. The key advantage? 1 fewer charging stop. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model S 90's 330km range doesn't beat the smart #3 Pro's 250km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #3 Pro needs only 8 charging stops compared to 9 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #3 Pro
- Total time: 15h 51min (317 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 31min
- Energy: ~298 kWh
- Distance: 1587km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
smart #3 Pro |
Tesla Model S 90 |
| Travel time |
15h 51min |
21h 8min |
| Charging time: |
1h 31min |
6h 32min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
9 |
| Energy used |
~286 kWh |
~286 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
smart #3 Pro Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
Orlen A2 MOP Tulce (10 min, 15% → 50%)
-
Stop 2:
MOP Walewice (10 min, 10% → 54%)
-
Stop 3:
Circle K Autohof Ferch (11 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 4:
Fastned Rastplatz Uhry Nord (10 min, 10% → 52%)
-
Stop 5:
Fastned Rastplatz Löwenburg (12 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 6:
Ehrenberg West (12 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 7:
IONITY Bierset (11 min, 10% → 56%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (15 min, 10% → 67%)
- Arrival: Paris
Tesla Model S 90 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Kuny (16 min, 39% → 54%)
-
Stop 2:
Orlen A2 MOP Sędzinko (66 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 3:
Aral Autohof Niederlehme (53 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 4:
Supercharger Euro Rastpark Irxleben/Hohenwarsleben (48 min, 10% → 89%)
-
Stop 5:
Gütersloh Nord (66 min, 10% → 72%)
-
Stop 6:
Aral Tankstelle (34 min, 10% → 42%)
-
Stop 7:
Q8 NORD (48 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 8:
Aire de La Sentinelle Ouest (51 min, 10% → 58%)
-
Stop 9:
Tesla Supercharger (10 min, 10% → 35%)
- Arrival: Paris
Why the smart #3 Pro Won
The smart #3 Pro achieved a 317-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 90 on this 1587km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 9 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 31min vs 6h 32min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~298 kWh vs ~385 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons