In our Warsaw to Rome EV duel, the smart #3 Pro beats the Tesla Model S 90 by 334 minutes, completing the 1759km route in 18h 32min. The key advantage? 3 fewer charging stops. Route calculated on September 7, 2026 using real-time charging station data.
The Tesla Model S 90's 330km range doesn't beat the smart #3 Pro's 250km here - charging speed and efficiency matter more.
The smart #3 Pro needs only 8 charging stops compared to 11 for the slowest vehicle, saving valuable time.
Winner
smart #3 Pro
- Total time: 18h 32min (334 min faster)
- Charging stops: 8
- Charging time: 1h 50min
- Energy: ~331 kWh
- Distance: 1759km
Quick Comparison
| Metric |
smart #3 Pro |
Tesla Model S 90 |
| Travel time |
18h 32min |
24h 6min |
| Charging time: |
1h 50min |
6h 53min |
| Charging stops: |
8 |
11 |
| Energy used |
~317 kWh |
~320 kWh |
Charging Strategy Breakdown
smart #3 Pro Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
MOP Dobieszowice Zachód (11 min, 22% → 64%)
-
Stop 2:
Signalbau (16 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV Tankstelle Breitenleer Straße Ost (12 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 4:
F. Leitner (12 min, 10% → 59%)
-
Stop 5:
Electra Pizza Plus (13 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 6:
Fratta Nord (17 min, 10% → 69%)
-
Stop 7:
Electra Borgo Mascarella (13 min, 10% → 61%)
-
Stop 8:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (16 min, 10% → 70%)
- Arrival: Rome
Tesla Model S 90 Route
- Start: Warsaw (100% charge)
-
Stop 1:
M1 Shopping Center (56 min, 12% → 65%)
-
Stop 2:
Penny Ztracená (29 min, 10% → 38%)
-
Stop 3:
OMV (50 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 4:
eni Tankstelle Wiener Neustädter Straße (37 min, 10% → 45%)
-
Stop 5:
Supercharger manufaktur matauschek (18 min, 10% → 57%)
-
Stop 6:
Smatrics Sonnenkraft Campus (16 min, 10% → 25%)
-
Stop 7:
Supercharger Maria-Gailer-Straße (23 min, 10% → 68%)
-
Stop 8:
Smatrics Eurospar (53 min, 10% → 60%)
-
Stop 9:
Ewiva Parco Commerciale Diamante (73 min, 10% → 79%)
-
Stop 10:
Area Servizio Badia al Pino Ovest (48 min, 10% → 55%)
-
Stop 11:
Supercharger La Pergola (10 min, 10% → 35%)
- Arrival: Rome
Why the smart #3 Pro Won
The smart #3 Pro achieved a 334-minute advantage over Tesla Model S 90 on this 1759km route. Key factors:
- Fewer charging stops: 8 stops vs 11 for the slowest vehicle means less time spent finding and connecting to chargers.
- Faster charging: Total charging time of 1h 50min vs 6h 53min thanks to higher peak charging speeds or better charging curve.
- Better efficiency: Lower energy consumption (~331 kWh vs ~426 kWh) means less time spent charging.
Related Comparisons